For nft projects
Mints get one shot. We review your contracts, harden your community channels, and stand up a response plan so a Discord compromise doesn't end your project.
Threat model
Off-by-one in supply, broken allowlist logic, missing access control on `withdraw`, signature replay across chains, these bugs are usually found by attackers, not by audits done in a hurry the night before launch.
Most NFT incidents are not contract exploits. They're phishing posts from a compromised mod account, fake mint URLs in announcements, or a webhook leak. Token-gating your channels and locking down moderator accounts is half the job.
Public founders attract spear phishing, SIM swaps, and social engineering. The treasury wallet, the deployer EOA, and the founders' personal devices need wallet hygiene that goes beyond a Ledger in a drawer.
Even when a holder signs a malicious approval on a third-party site, the community sees it as your problem. Education, official communication channels, and surveillance of the project wallet protect both the brand and the floor.
NFT projects fail less often from contract bugs than from operational mistakes, compromised mods, leaked deployer keys, fake mint links. The defense is technical and human at the same time.
Recommended services
Audit the mint contract weeks before launch (not days), then add Incident Response so you have a number to call when a moderator account is compromised at 2am.
DeFi smart contract audit by senior auditors. Adversarial review of Solidity, Vyper, and Cairo before mainnet.
Learn more →
Web3 incident response and DeFi exploit recovery. On-call when contracts get exploited or wallets get drained.
Learn more →
Read more
A pre-launch security checklist for NFT mints, contract bugs, mod-account hardening, deployer hygiene, and the operational pieces most projects skip.
Read article →
Account abstraction (ERC-4337 and ERC-7702) is reshaping wallet UX in 2026, and creating new attack surfaces. Paymaster abuse, validation-phase griefing, session-key compromise, and what to audit before shipping.
Read article →
Approval phishing is the dominant wallet-drain pattern on EVM chains. Here is how it works, why it works, and the operational habits that defeat it.
Read article →
Glossary
Phishing
Social engineering attack that tricks a user into approving a malicious transaction or revealing credentials.
Approval Phishing
Phishing that tricks a user into granting a token approval that lets the attacker drain assets later.
Wallet Drainer
A malicious smart contract or kit designed to drain assets from any wallet that signs an approval.
Smart Contract Audit
A manual and automated review of smart-contract code to identify security flaws before deployment.
